PublicationsThe U4 Blog

U4 Helpdesk Answer

Corruption and integrity in Tanzania’s tax administration

Tax administration in Tanzania has undergone several reforms in recent decades but still faces several obstacles, including corruption. The drivers of corruption include organised crime in the region, complex tax structures and administrative procedures, low law-enforcement capacity, political interventions and a large informal economy in the country. The tax administration is vulnerable to administrative corruption and policy capture by private interests. Consequences of corruption include a reduced revenue collection, weakened institutional capacity and the erosion of public trust in the tax authority – the foundation of tax compliance.

1 August 2025
Download PDF
Corruption and integrity in Tanzania’s tax administration

Main points

  • Tanzania has relatively low rates of revenue collection, and more effective tax collection is imperative to meet development and welfare needs.
  • The Tanzania Revenue Authority (TRA) operates in a difficult context for tax administration. Drivers of corruption risk in tax administration include organised crime, the informal economy, complicated tax rules, low law-enforcement capacity and political interventions.
  • Complex tax rules combined with heavy-handed enforcement tactics targeting small and medium-sized local enterprises reportedly create incentives for businesspeople to pay bribes to reduce or avoid taxation.
  • Tanzania’s geopolitical location along a key trade route for illicit goods from the Middle and Far East to Europe also makes it vulnerable to organised crime that may facilitate customs-related offences, further affecting tax administration.
  • The international tax system is not advantageous to low and lower middle income countries, such as Tanzania, which facilitates aggressive corporate tax avoidance by multinationals to the detriment of the national treasury.
  • The Tanzania Revenue Authority, like other government and law-enforcement agencies in the region, is at risk of state and policy capture by private interests such as networks of politicians, companies and organised crime networks.
  • The most recent Afrobarometer data available for Tanzania from 2024 found that 16.7% perceived ‘most’ or ‘all’ tax officials from the TRA to be corrupt (Afrobarometer 2025:40). This is a notable improvement from 2012, when 38% of Tanzanians expressed the same view (Afrobarometer 2015:33). However, it represents a slight decline from the previous 2022 Afrobarometer round, when only 12.4% of Tanzanians surveyed stated ‘most’ or ‘all’ tax officials from the TRA were corrupt (Afrobarometer 2023: 48).
  • This slight uptick in perceived corruption is potentially related to some high-profile protests by shop owners against the TRA in 2023 and 2024, generated by tax related grievances and allegations of corruption by TRA officers (Kyomo and Buhimila 2025:426).
  • Improving tax collection in Tanzania requires structural reform of local and international tax rules and collection methods. Integrity measures, capacity building and technological innovations are also needed.

Cite this publication


Maslen, C.; Jenkins, M. 2025. Corruption and integrity in Tanzania’s tax administration. Bergen: U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre, Chr. Michelsen Institute (U4 Helpdesk Answer 2025:20)

Download PDF

Matt Jenkins is a Research and Knowledge Manager at Transparency International, where he runs the Anti-Corruption Helpdesk, an on-demand bespoke research service for civil society activists and development practitioners. Jenkins specialises in anti-corruption evaluations and evidence reviews, he has produced studies for the OECD and the GIZ, and has worked at the European Commission and think tanks in Berlin and Hyderabad.

Disclaimer


All views in this text are the author(s)’, and may differ from the U4 partner agencies’ policies.

This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

Photo