PublicationsThe U4 Blog

U4 Helpdesk Answer

Anti-corruption and accountability in anglophone vs. francophone governance traditions

The legal and administrative systems of countries following the French traditions significantly differ from the Anglophone based systems. Traditionally, the French administrative system evolved around the notion of a unitary state, reflected in the strong emphasis on hierarchy and reporting lines. The French administration is accountable for its actions to the executive and to a number of other watchdog organisations. However, even across countries that have inherited the French systems, legal and administrative practices, as well as levels and forms of corruption, may vary significantly. Anti-corruption systems established in Benin, Senegal and Niger, for example, indicate that choices made with regard to the setting and operation of state control institutions, prosecution measures or systemic reforms depend on the specific political circumstance of each country. At the international level, Francophone Africa is characterised by a Franco-African model of relations and ties that introd

20 August 2003
Read onlineDownload PDF
Anti-corruption and accountability in anglophone vs. francophone governance traditions

Cite this publication


(2003) Anti-corruption and accountability in anglophone vs. francophone governance traditions. Bergen: U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre, Chr. Michelsen Institute (U4 Helpdesk Answer 2003)

Read onlineDownload PDF

Disclaimer


All views in this text are the author(s)’, and may differ from the U4 partner agencies’ policies.

This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

Photo