PublicationsThe U4 Blog

U4 Helpdesk Answer

Centralised versus decentralised anti-corruption institutions

The institutional arrangements governing ACAs greatly varies across countries - including with regard to their level of specialisation and centralisation - based on the local governance context and the specific circumstances that brought them into existence. Some countries have established a separate and centralised institution exclusively dealing with corruption, while others have opted for strengthening the anti-corruption capacity of a set of existing institutions or for a combination of both approaches. Some have also created several specialised bodies with complementary and sometimes overlapping mandates.

Also available in French
16 March 2012
Download PDF
Centralised versus decentralised anti-corruption institutions

Cite this publication


Chêne, M. 2012. Centralised versus decentralised anti-corruption institutions . Expert Answer 323

Download PDF
Marie Chêne

Disclaimer


All views in this text are the author(s)’, and may differ from the U4 partner agencies’ policies.

This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

Photo