| Site Map | About U4 | Feedback | Contact | U4 partner agencies   U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre
 
 

Themes    Other Resources    Training    Expert Answers

 
 

Home > Themes > UN Convention against Corruption (UNCAC)


UNCAC

U4 REPORT
Anti-corruption policy making in practice:

What can be learned for the implementation of Article 5 of UNCAC?

Report of six country case studies:
Georgia, Indonesia, Nicaragua, Pakistan, Tanzania, and Zambia
(Includes full text of all the country case studies)

Edited by Karen Hussmann

U4 Report 1-2007 Download this U4 Report 1:2007 (December) as pdf [1.6 MB]

[Syntheses also available in Spanish and French]

Abstract

Fighting corruption is a challenge in any context, because corruption has many faces and can occur in different forms across all sectors and institutions of a country. The UN Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) recognises this and calls, among others, for “effective, coordinated anti-corruption policies” (Article 5) to address the problem strategically. This report explores what form such an approach could take, and examines in depth how national anti-corruption policies or strategies have come into being in six countries: Georgia, Indonesia, Nicaragua, Pakistan, Tanzania and Zambia. From a public policy perspective the authors look specifically at the catalysts and driving forces, how reforms were selected, prioritised and implemented, and finally, what role development partners played in the overall process. 

The country studies show that the political response to perceived widespread corruption in those countries often consisted in the development of a broad national anti-corruption policy or strategy. Nevertheless, this approach has not been overly successful for a variety of reasons, ranging from unrealistic planning and the lack of prioritising reforms, to serious shortcomings in the implementation arrangements, and the absence of vital political agreements for effective reforms.

The report argues that explicit anti-corruption policies and strategies are not necessarily the most suitable and certainly not the only way to implement Article 5 of UNCAC, and goes on to discuss other options for coordinated anti-corruption policies. The report also points to the need of pursuing anti-corruption work with effective and modest targets instead of ambitious but unfeasible promises.

 

U4 BRIEF
Anti-corruption policy making in practice:
Implications for implementing UNCAC

(Karen Hussmann and Hannes Hechler)

U4 Brief 1:2008 Download this U4 Brief 1:2008 (January) as pdf [187 Kb]

Broad national anti-corruption strategies have so far been a popular response by governments to wide-spread corruption in many countries. The results have, however, been mixed. This U4 Brief argues that States Parties to the UN Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) should have a strategic vision when they "develop and implement or maintain effective, coordinated anti-corruption policies" as Article 5 stipulates. The authors also argue that anti-corruption policies may be conducted in many different ways, and they are not limited to anti-corruption strategies alone.

Return to UNCAC Theme overview

 

 

 
UNCAC
Anti-Corruption Policy Making
Asset Recovery
Selected Literature
Links
English English
Spanish Español
French Français

Query the U4 helpdesk about UNCAC or other anti-corruption conventions

U4 welcomes any feedback on our UNCAC and other anti-corruption conventions pages


CONTACT

Hannes Hechler
Programme Coordinator (U4)
hannes.hechler@cmi.no
+47 47 93 80 71


RELEVANT EXPERT ANSWERS

Good Practice in Whistleblowing Protection Legislation (WPL)

The African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM)

South-south anti-corruption cooperation mechanisms

The effectiveness of donor responses to corruption in deteriorating environments

Comparative assessment of anti-corruption conventions' review mechanisms


UNCAC UPDATES

The Kaufmann Governance Post
Why transparency, governance and corruption matter, and what we can all do about it


RELEVANT READING


Recovering stolen assets
Pieth, M (ed.) (2008)

Experience with asset recovery is limited, and a number of legal and other obstacles continue to impede progress. This book constitutes the first comprehensive work on asset recovery, written by renowned practitioners and academics representing different legal systems and countries. The authors discuss 'success stories' of the past and concrete challenges for the future with regard to search, seizure, confiscation and repatriation of stolen assets. The book also provides perspectives on the role of technical assistance and donors in asset recovery and the likely impact of the UNCAC.



GAP Analysis Study Report
Corruption Eradication Commission - The Republic of Indonesia (2006)

Identification of Gaps between Laws/Regulations of the Republic of Indonesia and the United Nations Convention Against Corruption.



UNCAC: A Bangladesh Compliance & Gap Analysis
Institute of Governance Studies

This revised GAP report is a manifestation of the Bangladeshi government’s continuous efforts to have a comprehensive and in-depth assessment on the status of implementation of the UNCAC in Bangladesh.



Kenya: UNCAC Gap Analysis Report and Implementation Plan
Kenya Department for Justice, National Cohesion and Constitutional Affairs (2009)

The purpose of this Gap analysis is to ascertain the extent of Kenya's compliance with UNCAC and to design a schedule for full implementation of the Convention.


RELEVANT U4 PUBLICATIONS

Sitting on the Fence: Conflicts of Interest and How to Regulate Them
Reed, Quentin (U4 Issue 2008:6)


RELEVANT LINKS

IGAC website
International Group for Anti-Corruption Coordination (IGAC)


Stolen Asset Recovery (StAR) Initiative
World Bank


Official UNCAC website
UNODC


Transparency International's UNCAC web pages
Transparency International


UNODC's webpage on corruption issues
UNODC


GTZ's UNCAC project's home page
BMZ


Asset Recovery Knowledge Centre
Basel Institute on Governance


 

 



Home | Top
U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre http://www.u4.no