Ideally Budget processes should start with an economic overview and revenue
forecast for the budget year. The forecast will, together with an assessment
of how the budget deficit should be financed, give directions for total
recurrent and capital spending. This is considered an analytical job taken
care of by the inner echelons of the Ministry of Finance, occasionally
assisted by consultants. There appears to be little scope for corruption
at this stage, but it is of course possible to prepare for future embezzlement,
taxation moneys, or favouritism to certain taxpayers by preparing pessimistic
projections. The latter might be the case if the tax department or independent
revenue authority plays a key role in the projection process.
Preparation of Budget Policy outline
The budget policy outline represents the bridge to the multi-year plan
document. It will in broad terms describe the policies and strategies
in the plan which a current budget should emphasise, and how. The outline
will, in particular, set the scene for the preparation of expenditure
ceilings. If the plan is inconsistent and unclear, so will also the policy
outline be, which results in unclear directions for the preparation of
the expenditure targets. In this case the concrete expenditure targets
can be influenced by bureaucrats and the political level of the Ministry
of Finance in a way which prepares the ground for corruption at later
stages. Recently, some countries have called on the private sector and
civil society to comment or even participate in this step of the process,
in order to increase accountability at this stage.
Preparation of expenditure targets or ceilings by the Ministry of Finance
(MF)
The preparation of expenditure targets (or ceilings) is in theory the
first step that turns the verbal policy statements into concrete numbers
in budget allocations. Usually quite a few features of this 'first shot'
will remain and influence the final approved budget. 'Textbook' approaches
such as the MTEF is adamant that this allocation must be clearly based
on plans, macro frameworks, budget policy outlines, etc. In reality, there
are several factors - in rich and poor countries alike - that make this
process is difficult.
The more unclear the preceding policy documents are, the more difficult
it is to link the budget allocations to them. In practice, what is used
is 'incremental budgeting', i.e. budget items are increased, sometimes
by a uniform percentage, sometimes by slightly different percentages.
This is done inside the Ministry of Finance - in isolation from the public
eye - and often goes directly to the Cabinet for a discussion. Because
of the powerful position of the Minister of Finance - it tends to be accepted
by Cabinet.
It is easy to imagine how corruption can take form at this stage. A ministry
which has good connections to the staff outlining the first set of ceilings,
or to the Minister of Finance, can cut a deal to increase its relative
allocation. This allocation may be reversed in subsequent budget discussions,
but in many countries with pressed budgetary situations, changes in the
allocation suggested by the ministry of finance scarcely take place.
“It is our money. Where is it gone?” is a short documentary, released by the International Budget Partnership, on an initiative, in Mombasa (Kenya) to involve communities directly in monitoring the Constituency Development Fund, a fund managed by Kenyan parliamentarians. Through social audits, communities monitored budgets and held their government accountable for managing the public’s money and meeting the needs of the poor.
This U4 Brief assesses how banks facilitate illicit capital flows from developing countries. The shortcomings of the existing regulatory frameworks are discussed, and recommendations are made for donor governments on what can be done to curb the flow of corrupt money out of the developing world.