Corruption in public budget processes is a particularly important type of
corruption. Public expenditure - and especially public investment - is known
to offer some of the best opportunities for corruption.
The most specific consequences of budgetary corruption are closely linked
to government efficiency. Budgetary corruption:
Misallocates scarce resources. Resources are diverted from
government coffers into private hands. Important expenditures for development
and for social safety nets are reduced. Limited funds for priority social
sector spending are reallocated to areas that benefit few people.
Renders government planning ineffective. Corruption at the
implementation stage of the budget process implies that actual spending
differs markedly from original expenditure plans.
Reduces public confidence in the rule of law and undermines government
legitimacy. The hold and influence of criminal and corrupt elements
in society is increased. Public faith in government and public sector
integrity is diluted.
Budgetary corruption thus produces many of the same consequences as
corruption in general, in reducing investment and growth. Moreover, by
directly affecting spending on priority sectors such as education and
health, budgetary corruption can have a particularly damaging effect on
the prospects of the poor.
Corruption has a negative effect on international development efforts.
It has become necessary for donor agencies to assure their constituencies
that aid resources are not used effectively to promote growth and reduce
proverty. Donors increasingly emphasise the need for effective public
expenditure management and financial accountability systems, and multilateral
and bilateral donor agencies put anti-corruption measures high on their
agendas. The World Bank adopted an anti-corruption policy in 1997, and
the Asian Development Bank did the same in 1998. In 1999, the OECD countries
negotiated an Anti-Bribery Convention, and more recently the IMF has developed
Standards and Codes of Fiscal Transparency (IMF Fiscal ROSCs) addressing
these issues.
On the African continent, the New Partnership for Africa's Development
(NEPAD) has articulated the importance of accountability, describing corruption,
ineffective policies, and waste of resources as major causes of the continent's
stagnation. African countries will, under NEPAD, have to commit to good
governance and collaboration against corruption.
“It is our money. Where is it gone?” is a short documentary, released by the International Budget Partnership, on an initiative, in Mombasa (Kenya) to involve communities directly in monitoring the Constituency Development Fund, a fund managed by Kenyan parliamentarians. Through social audits, communities monitored budgets and held their government accountable for managing the public’s money and meeting the needs of the poor.
This U4 Brief assesses how banks facilitate illicit capital flows from developing countries. The shortcomings of the existing regulatory frameworks are discussed, and recommendations are made for donor governments on what can be done to curb the flow of corrupt money out of the developing world.