| Site Map | About U4 | Feedback | Contact | U4 partner agencies   U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre
 
 

Themes    Other Resources    Training    Expert Answers

 
 

Home > Themes > Public Financial Management and Procurement


The budget process and corruption:

2. Consequences of budgetary corruption

back to index page on BP & corruption

 


Severe implications for governement efficiency

Corruption in public budget processes is a particularly important type of corruption. Public expenditure - and especially public investment - is known to offer some of the best opportunities for corruption.

The most specific consequences of budgetary corruption are closely linked to government efficiency. Budgetary corruption:

  • Misallocates scarce resources. Resources are diverted from government coffers into private hands. Important expenditures for development and for social safety nets are reduced. Limited funds for priority social sector spending are reallocated to areas that benefit few people.

  • Renders government planning ineffective. Corruption at the implementation stage of the budget process implies that actual spending differs markedly from original expenditure plans.

  • Reduces public confidence in the rule of law and undermines government legitimacy. The hold and influence of criminal and corrupt elements in society is increased. Public faith in government and public sector integrity is diluted.

Budgetary corruption thus produces many of the same consequences as corruption in general, in reducing investment and growth. Moreover, by directly affecting spending on priority sectors such as education and health, budgetary corruption can have a particularly damaging effect on the prospects of the poor.

Corruption has a negative effect on international development efforts. It has become necessary for donor agencies to assure their constituencies that aid resources are not used effectively to promote growth and reduce proverty. Donors increasingly emphasise the need for effective public expenditure management and financial accountability systems, and multilateral and bilateral donor agencies put anti-corruption measures high on their agendas. The World Bank adopted an anti-corruption policy in 1997, and the Asian Development Bank did the same in 1998. In 1999, the OECD countries negotiated an Anti-Bribery Convention, and more recently the IMF has developed Standards and Codes of Fiscal Transparency (IMF Fiscal ROSCs) addressing these issues.

On the African continent, the New Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD) has articulated the importance of accountability, describing corruption, ineffective policies, and waste of resources as major causes of the continent's stagnation. African countries will, under NEPAD, have to commit to good governance and collaboration against corruption.

go to next page: 3. Where in the budget process does corruption tend to occur?

[top]

  Corruption in public financial management and procurement
Public Financial Management
and Procurement
Budget process
Revenue administration
Fiscal decentralisation
Direct budget support
Public Expenditure Tracking
Procurement

Query the U4 helpdesk about PFM

U4 welcomes any feedback on our PFM pages


CONTACT

Hannes Hechler
Programme Coordinator (U4)
hannes.hechler@cmi.no
+47 47 93 80 71


RECOMMENDED READING

“It is our money. Where is it gone?” is a short documentary, released by the International Budget Partnership, on an initiative, in Mombasa (Kenya) to involve communities directly in monitoring the Constituency Development Fund, a fund managed by Kenyan parliamentarians. Through social audits, communities monitored budgets and held their government accountable for managing the public’s money and meeting the needs of the poor.


RELATED U4 PUBLICATIONS

Profiting from corruption: The role and responsibility of financial institutions
Palmer, Robert (U4 Brief 2009:31)

This U4 Brief assesses how banks facilitate illicit capital flows from developing countries. The shortcomings of the existing regulatory frameworks are discussed, and recommendations are made for donor governments on what can be done to curb the flow of corrupt money out of the developing world.


RELEVANT EXPERT ANSWERS

Fiduciary safeguards for minimising corruption risks when using budget support

Examples of anti-corruption clauses in cooperation agreements

Auditing the auditors - International Standards to hold Supreme Audit Institutions to account

Exploring the Relationships between Corruption and Tax Revenue

Corruption in tax administration

Corruption and the international financial system

The role of supreme audit institutions in combating corruption

The political economy of public procurement reform

The implementation of Integrated Financial Management Systems (IFMIS)

Designing a Taxpayer Baseline Survey in Uganda



Home | Top
U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre http://www.u4.no