|
Wade
Channell, Lessons
Not Learned: Problems with Western Aid for Law Reform in Postcommunist
Countries, Carnegie Papers series, Number 57, 2005.
A candid and very interesting analysis of the problems
of organisational learning
In Chapter 2, Channell points out that the problems for learning
should be placed on the lack of effective incentives. Generally
speaking, rewards are seen to be available for those who know,
but not necessarily for those who learn. It is argued that project
design and selection processes reward repetition, not innovation.
Attempts to change this process have failed because they do not
take into account the fact that the contractor side of the aid
industry is also hampered by a counterproductive incentive structure.
When lessons are actually learned, they are not shared, because
the incentives only encourage production and storage of knowledge,
not publication.
Simon McGrath,
& Kenneth King , Knowledge-based aid: a four agency comparative
study, International Journal of Educational Development, vol.
24, no. 2, pp. 167-181, 2004.
Simon
McGrath, & Kenneth King, Knowledge for Development? Comparing
British, Japanese, Swedish and World Bank Aid, Zed Books 2004.
These two studies by the same set of authors provide a
through analysis of knowledge management and its application in
bilateral and multilateral development agencies
Part of the response of many development cooperation agencies
to the challenges of globalisation, ICTs and the knowledge economy
is to emphasise the importance of knowledge for development. This
paper looks at the discourses and practices of 'knowledge-based
aid' through an exploration of four agencies: the World Bank,
DFID, Sida and JICA. It seeks to analyse whether knowledge-based
aid leads to greater focus on agencies' own needs rather than
those of Southern partners. It also questions whether it makes
them better at learning from these partners or more intent on
a one-way, North-South transfer of knowledge.
Bryane
Michael, Explaining
Organisational Change in International Development: The Role of
Complexity in Anti-Corruption Work, Journal of International
Development 16(8):1067 - 1088.
This article looks at the rapid expansion of programmes
undertaken by donor agencies which may be labelled as "anti-corruption
programmes" in the 1990s. It tries to explain what schools
of thought have been driving the agenda
In this article Michael argues that there are four schools
of anti-corruption project practice: universalistic, state-centric,
society-centric, and critical schools of practice. Yet, none can
explain the expansion of anti-corruption projects. A "complexity
perspective" offers a new framework for looking at such growth.
Such a complexity perspective addresses how project managers, by
strategically interacting, can create emergent and evolutionary
expansionary self-organisation. Throughout the "first wave"
of anti-corruption activity in the 1990s, such self-organisation
was largely due to World Bank sponsored national anti-corruption
programmes. More broadly, the experience of the first wave of anti-corruption
practice sheds light on development theory and practice - helping
to explain "post-developmentalist" practice with its stress
on multi-layeredness, participation, and indigenous knowledge.
Anna Krohwinkel-Karlsson, Knowledge and Learning in Aid Organizations. pdf, SADEV working paper 2007:1.
Research on organizational learning and knowledge management has developed quickly over the last decades. There are many empirical studies that attempt to advise about the effective design of knowledge and learning systems in different contexts. This recent report argues however that current work suffers from weak connections between theory and practice. This review paper uses conceptual frameworks from the academic literature to organize and synthesize findings from existing analyses of organizational practice within development cooperation. Rather than presenting yet another set of guidelines, the purpose is to link theoretical, methodological and empirical considerations with one another in order to identify knowledge gaps and emerging issues. This is intended to provide input for practitioners working with organizational development, and guide the design of prospective evaluations on related topics. In the main it is argued that analyses of knowledge and learning would benefit from more systematic reflection on the various types of causes of organizational change, the various types of effects, the normative assessment of results and intertemporal documentation challenges. A discussion about the implications of these conclusions for future studies wraps up the paper.
If you have suggestions for literature that should
be highlighted in this section, please contact u4@u4.no |