Corruption in the health sector
|
Corruption
and the Provision of Health Care and Education Services
Sanjeev Gupta, Hamid Davoodi and Erwin Tiongron,
IMF Working Paper, 2000
This paper reviews the relevant theoretical models and users' perceptions of corruption in the public provision of social services. Reports based on public service delivery surveys are found to confirm the pervasiveness of corruption and bribery in the public provision of health and education services. Evidence that reducing corruption can result in significant gains as measured by decreases in child and infant mortality rates, percent of low-birth weight babies, and primary school dropout rates are provided.
The purpose of the review is to determine whether a link between corruption and the outcome of public provision of social services can be established. However, the question of what causes such links and how to approach the problem of corruption receives less attention. Suggested policy implications appear rather conventional and devoid of contextual considerations.
Corruption and the Health sector
Taryn Vian, USAID/MSI, 2002
In this volume of the Sectoral Perspectives on Corruption series prepared
by MSI and sponsored by US Agency for International Development, Taryn
Vian describes the important areas of vulnerability to corruption within
the health sector and identifies tools and approaches for prevention.
Although it is acknowledged that corruption is of concern to all countries,
the focus of this work is on developing and transitional economies in
which public resources are scarce and inadequate systems are crippling
their growth and development. Two areas of special focus are the supply
of drugs and medical equipment, and informal economic activities of health
providers. These areas account for large losses in resources and have
direct effects on health by reducing quality of care and access to services,
especially for the poor.
Following a detailed analysis of the types of corruption that occur in
the health sector, Vian discusses the procurement and management of medicines,
equipment and supplies, including the selection process, promotion, and
distribution. She then discusses the informal economic activities of health
personnel and health reform in connection to global funds before orienting
strategies for health within overall anti-corruption activities at the
national level. In addition to stressing the importance of approaching
the problem of health sector corruption within a broader multi-sectoral
anti-corruption strategy, it is emphasised that commitment should be built
by demonstrating how reducing corruption can result in better health outcomes,
improved quality and expanded access. The paper is concluded with an agenda
for further research and an extensive bibliography. The paper has since
been published in Bertram I Spector, ed. Fighting Corruption in Developing
Countries (Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press Inc., 2005).
Corruption
and the Delivery of Health and Education Services
Azfar, Omar, USAID/MSI, 2002
Another volume of the Sectoral Perspectives on Corruption series prepared
by MSI and sponsored by USAID, Omar Azfar starts by reviewing the literature
on the effect of corruption on health and education outcomes. Drawing
on data collected in a study in the Philippines, he cites a significant
and clear effect of corruption on the knowledge of required immunizations
by physicians, even after controlling for variables such as income levels,
voting rates, media exposure, delays in salary payments and the supply
of medicines. The estimated the impact of corruption on patient satisfaction
and waiting times was in the right direction (i.e. corruption lowered
satisfaction and increased waiting times), but was not statistically significant.
The author discusses the nature of corruption in the health sector in
terms of relationships: patient-doctor, payer-hospital, hospital-supplier,
and within the ministry of health or any particular facility. Causes of
corruption are reviewed, as well as emerging empirical data sets and ongoing
research (i.e. public expenditure tracking surveys, quantitative service
delivery surveys). As with Vian's paper, this paper has since been published
in Bertram I spector, ed. Fighting Corruption in Developing Countries
(Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press Inc., 2005).
Diagnosis Corruption
Di Tella, Rafael and William D. Savedoff, 2001,
Source : Book (only chapter 1 available online)
One area not much discussed in the literature on corruption, particularly
in Latin America, is health care. Health expenditures represent more than
7 percent of Latin America's GDP, with about 3.5 percent of GDP spent
by the public sector alone. More than two-thirds of the public expenditures
go to build, maintain, and operate public hospitals and provide related
services, creating wide latitude for potential corruption.
Using studies of public-sector hospitals, this book addresses several
issues. First, it demonstrates that objective data on corruption can be
collected, analyzed, and used to stem corruption. Second, it measures
and characterizes the abuse found in Latin America's public hospitals
that drains government resources and compromises the health system's ability
to serve the people. Finally, it identifies what features in the structure
of incentives, accountability, and transparency can be used to reduce
the scope and costs of this corruption.
The editors emphasise that this study is only a first step in analyzing a very complex and hidden phenomenon. Because the case studies in this book were designed to focus on fraud and misuse of funds within hospitals, they exclude much of the corruption related to the ministries and institutes that build, maintain, and operate hospitals. Looking at bribes, theft, absenteeism and overcharging for supplies in public hospitals in various countries, this volume shows that it is possible not only to measure corruption in new ways, but to identify systemic factors that encourage or discourage malfeasance in the health sector. The studies provide policymakers, researchers and public sector administrators with insight and tools in the struggle to reduce corruption, strengthen democracy, and build public trust.
The characteristics of corruption in different health systems
Savedoff, William D., WHO, 2003 (draft - not available
online)
This paper is based on the conviction that tackling corruption requires an understanding of the various forms of abuse, and that health care corruption is not exclusive to one kind of health system. It begins by looking at definitions of corruption and fraud and how they manifest themselves in particular ways in health systems. It then discusses how the different structures of health systems lead to different kinds of abuse, and provides a review of the evidence regarding the kinds, magnitudes and effects of corruption and fraud. It concludes with a discussion of some of the mechanisms and policies that show promise in fighting this problem. Although this paper is not limited to developing or transitional economies, it reflects the fact that the majority of the available evidence is focused on such countries.
Global Corruption Report 2006: Corruption in Health
Transparency International
The Global Corruption Report is published annually by Transparency International.
In 2006, the theme of the report is health and corruption. The report
includes chapters on risks of corruption according to health system and
governance structure; the scale of the problem, including problems in
both developed and developing countries; costs and consequences of corruption
in the health sector, including corruption in hospitals, drug supply systems,
and informal payments, and corruption in HIV/AIDS programs.
Accountability
and Health Systems: overview, framework and strategies
- Health systems called to account: a framework and guidelines for exploring
accountability issues in the health sector
Brinkerhoff, D., Partners for Health reform plus (PHRplus),
2003
All health systems contain accountability relationships of different
types, which function with varying degrees of success. Often it is the
perception of failed or insufficient accountability that furnishes the
impetus for reform. This paper provides a framework and guidance in reinforcing
accountability in government service provision.
The author addresses: definition and clarification of accountability,
analytic framework for accountability and health service delivery systems,
role of health sector actors in accountability, and accountability-strengthening
strategies. The paper describes three accountability-enhancing strategies:
reducing abuse, assuring compliance with procedures and standards, and
improving performance/learning.
Using an accountability lens can help to generate a system-wide perspective
on health sector reform and identify connections among individual improvement
interventions. These results can support synergistic outcomes, enhance
system performance, and contribute to sustainability.
Accountability, Transparency and Corruption in Decentralized Governance
World Bank, 2006
This short article describes how decentralized governance is strengthened
through citizen participation and accountability. Citizen participation
allows the public to influence the direction and content of government
services, while accountability provides 'validation of participation'
by holding government authorities responsible for their actions.
Two types of accountability are discussed: the accountability of government
workers to elected officials, and the accountability of elected officials
to citizens. The first type of accountability is seen as more problematic
and difficult to achieve because of the strong incentives government workers
have to evade control by local authorities and maintain relationships
with their "parent" ministry. Means of ensuring accountability
of elected officials to citizens are discussed at more length, including
elections (seen as a blunt tool), political party and NGO activities,
informational strategies (including local media and public meetings),
and formal complaint procedures.
The article notes that increased transparency may not reduce corruption
in the short-run, but will increase citizen awareness of corruption. Beyond
transparency, accountability mechanisms are needed to actually reduce
corruption.
Service accountability and community participation in the context of health sector reforms in Asia: Implication for sexual and reproductive health services. Ranjani K. Murthy and Barbara Klugman, 2004, Health Policy and Planning; 19 (Suppl.1): i78-i86. [Online purchase only!]
Community participation is often promoted as a strategy to increase government accountability for provision of services. But does it work? In this article, the authors review the experiences of 18 health sector reform initiatives in Asia, exploring the relationship between community participation and accountability. They conclude that community participation is often not effective in ensuring accountability due to lack of capacity of the communities. The authors recommend investments in building the power of civil society representatives as stakeholders.
Common strategies to increase accountability include increasing competition from the private sector; decentralization; and community financing. The first strategy works by increasing options or citizen choices, while the second and third options increase citizen voice and influence in decision making: strategies which increase the "answerability" of those who hold power to citizens. According to the authors, it is this latter function of accountability that is most important, figuring out how citizens can make sure that governments explain or justify what they actually do.
The article analyzes four different types of community participation
in program management, including operations planning, monitoring of health
delivery, managing infrastructure, and user fee collection and management,
explaining how each type of participation can enforce accountability of
health managers and workers. The article also suggests ways central governments
can enforce accountability of decentralized units in the implementation
of national policies. Suggested improvements for accountability include
formalizing 'participation contracts' between civil society and government,
and capacity building of civil society stakeholders in terms of better
leadership models, and advocacy training.
Public
Management and the Essential Health Functions
Das Gupta, M, Khaleghian, P. World Bank Policy Research
Working Paper 3220, 2004
This paper provides an overview of how various approaches to improving public sector management relate to the so-called core or essential public health functions (EPHFs) such as disease surveillance, health education, monitoring and evaluation, workforce development, enforcement of public health laws and regulations, public health research, and health policy development (IOM 1987; PAHO 2002). Its purpose is to summarize key themes in the public management literature and draw lessons for the EPHFs. Section I summarizes "new public management" approaches. Section II reviews traditional approaches to public administration and their relevance to the EPHFs. Section III summarizes lessons in point form.
Governance
and Corruption in Public Health Care Systems
Maureen Lewis, Centre for Global Development, 2006
This excellent working paper looks at factual evidence to describe the main challenges facing health care delivery in developing countries, including absenteeism, corruption, informal payments, and mismanagement. The author concludes that good governance is important in ensuring effective health care delivery, and that returns to investments in health are low where governance issues are not addressed. The paper provides policy options for promoting better governance.
|
|
| CONTACT |
|
Harald Mathisen
|
| SPOTLIGHT |
Review of corruption in the health sector:
theory, methods and interventions .pdf |
| RECOMMENDED READING |
|
Governance
and Corruption in Public Health Care Systems This excellent working paper looks at factual evidence to describe the main challenges facing health care delivery in developing countries, including absenteeism, corruption, informal payments, and mismanagement. The author concludes that good governance is important in ensuring effective health care delivery, and that returns to investments in health are low where governance issues are not addressed. The paper provides policy options for promoting better governance. |
| |
|
| Home | Top | |
| U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre | http://www.u4.no |