| Site Map | About U4 | Feedback | Contact | U4 partner agencies   U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre
 
 

Themes    Other Resources    Training    Expert Answers

 
 

Home > Themes > Corruption in the health sector


Corruption in the health sector

Good practice - Examples

back to content page on Good practice - Examples

 

 

Project title

Improving Health in Malawi

Sector wide approach including essential health package and emergency human resources programme
Responsible DFID (UK)
Partners World Bank and Norway/Sida as pool financiers
Global Fund, USAID, JICA, GTZ and UN agencies
through project funding
Implementer Government of Malawi
Period 2005/6 - 20010/11
Amount (DFID): £ 100 million
Document Programme Memorandum, November 2004
Contact persons Julia Kemp, health advisor
Debbie Palmer, assistant governance advisor

Project description

In December 2004 DFID agreed to provide £100 million to the Malawi Government for support to the health sector over a period of six years (2005/6 to 2010/11). DFID is pooling its contribution to the Sector Wide Approach (SWAp) in health with the World Bank and Norway/Sida.

A Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) governs the relationship between the Government of Malawi and collaborating partners and sets out the different undertakings, governance procedures for the SWAp and capacity building requirements.

The three main components of the DFID support are:

  • an Essential Health Package designed to deliver a prioritised package of services that focuses on the major causes of morbidity and mortality, particularly those that affect the poor;
  • an Emergency Human Resources Programme that aims to double the number of nurses and triple the number of doctors in Malawi by expanding training capacity and improving incentives for health workers to stay in the profession;
  • and capacity building in financial management, procurement, human resources, monitoring and evaluation, and health services planning and management.

DFID intends to set up a joint health office with Norway/Sida to improve the effectiveness and lower transactions costs for the Government and other collaborating partners.

Anti-corruption aspects

The programme is rated "high risk" by DFID not because of programme design, which is viewed as "medium risk", but due to factors exogenous to programme design. Overall sector funding is below recommended levels and may be inadequate to produce significant impact on health outcomes. It has been assumed that more aid will become available in due course.

Malawi has begun a reform process under its new government, but future governments may not sustain it. The new government has demonstrated determination to impose greater fiscal discipline and fiduciary reforms, which are seen as necessary to enable the programme to achieve its objectives. A new public procurement system is being implemented.

Donors are supporting Government plans to institutionalise political reform in the hope that stronger institutions will make backsliding more difficult. Financial management and procurement procedures have been developed for the SWAp, offering safeguards while simultaneously building capacity at central and district levels. These include time bound Financial Management and Procurement Improvement Plans, a commitment to fill accountant vacancies, independent financial and procurement audits, and long-term Technical Assistants with mentoring, management and supervisory responsibilities.

World Bank procedures will be used for international competitive bidding until Government systems become fully and effectively operational.

Corruption was a major problem under the previous government, especially in the drugs and the supply chain. A condition precedent for DFID disbursements is an agreement on an action plan to improve the effectiveness and integrity of the Central Medical Stores and drugs supply chain.

To retain and attract health workers one aim of the human resources programme is to raise health workers salaries. The proposed salary top-ups are affordable only if fully funded by donors. DFID recognises that the Government is vulnerable to the withdrawal of donor funding and has undertaken to give notice of two financial years, in the unlikely event that the UK Government felt it necessary to withdraw or reduce its contribution to salary support.

Other donor supported activities in Malawi of relevance for reducing the risk of corruption in the health sector:

  • Financial Management, Transparency and Accountability Project (FIMTAP), World Bank, 2003. This ongoing project aims to improve an effective and accountable use of public expenditures through capacity building and institutional strengthening for budget implementation and oversight, and increase transparency of government institutions, as well as improve human and institutional capacity for expenditure accountability. Project assessment documents can be downloaded from the World Bank web site.

[top]

back to index page
on Corruption in Health


 

go to next page: Budget transparency


 
Corruption in the health sector
Causes and consequences
Financial resources management
Management of medical supplies
Health worker/patient interaction
Good practice
Budget transparency
Salaries
Literature review
Links

Query the U4 helpdesk about corruption in the health sector

U4 welcomes any feedback on the U4 Health pages


CONTACT

Harald Mathisen
Co-director and Senior Programme Coordinator (U4) (Head of Training)
harald.mathisen@cmi.no
+47 47938070


RELEVANT EXPERT ANSWERS

Low salaries, the culture of per diems and corruption

Corruption challenges at sub-national level in Indonesia

Corruption in the health and education sectors in Mali

Tackling forms of corruption that affect the poor most


SPOTLIGHT

Review of corruption in the health sector: theory, methods and interventions .pdf
(Taryn Vian)
This article presents a comprehensive framework and a set of methodologies for describing and measuring how opportunities, pressures and rationalizations influence corruption in the health sector. The article discusses implications for intervention, and presents examples of how theory has been applied in research and practice. Challenges of tailoring anti-corruption strategies to particular contexts, and future directions for research, are addressed.
Published in Health Policy and Planning (Volume 23, Number 2, March 2008). [The Open Access to this article is sponsored by U4]

A tale of two health systems
. pdf

(William D. Savedoff)

A closer look at two countries demonstrates how corruption manifests itself differently across health systems. Colombia and Venezuela are neighbouring Latin American countries with comparable incomes that share many similarities in history, culture and language. Until 1990, the two countries also had similarly fragmented health systems, comprised of a large social security institutions that served the formal sector; national or state-level governments that directly provided health care services to the rest of the population; and an active private sector that relied predominantly on direct payment for services by patients and their families. In the early 1990s, Colombia engaged a series of dramatic health reforms that decentralised public services to the municipal level and, in parallel, created a mandatory universal insurance system with the participation of non-governmental insurers (for-profit and non-profit).

Detailed Implementation Review India Health Sector 2006-2007 Volume II .pdf
This Report summarizes the findings of a Detailed Implementation Review (DIR) of five Bank-financed projects in India: the Food and Drugs Capacity Building Project, the Orissa Health Systems Development Project, the Second National AIDS Control Project, the Malaria Control Project, and the Tuberculosis Control Project.


RECOMMENDED READING

Governance and Corruption in Public Health Care Systems
Maureen Lewis, Centre for Global Development, 2006

This excellent working paper looks at factual evidence to describe the main challenges facing health care delivery in developing countries, including absenteeism, corruption, informal payments, and mismanagement. The author concludes that good governance is important in ensuring effective health care delivery, and that returns to investments in health are low where governance issues are not addressed. The paper provides policy options for promoting better governance.



Home | Top
U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre http://www.u4.no