Netherlands, DFID, World Bank, EU, USAID,
Danida, Ireland Aid, Unicef, UNFPA, JICA, GTZ, WHO and UNFPA (15 collaborating
partners signed a MOU 1999 with the Zambian Ministry of Health outlining
the vision of the health sector reform process)
The Assessment Memorandum proposes a continued Sector Programme Support
(SPS) to the Zambian health sector for the period 2002-2005 in the order
of USD 6 million annually.
The Swedish support is by definition flexible in nature and a main objective
is to continue the process of strengthening the SWAp process itself. The
support is based on the Zambia National Health Strategic Plan 2001-2005,
which has been assessed and appraised by a large number of stakeholders.
Since SPS is a long term commitment, very close attention is being paid
to the political and economic development in Zambia. The memorandum emphasises
the external context in which the SWAp takes place with a risk analysis
including a possible alternative strategy. It is argued that SPS is the
only sustainable way of supporting the Zambian health sector and the memorandum
outlines a strategy on how to do this in a difficult political environment.
Anti-corruption aspects
The memorandum, Chapter 3, "Assessment of the external context",
includes a section on corruption stating that:
"there are a number of reports indicating that corruption and
misuse of power at a very high political level is widespread
and there are numerous examples of supposed corruption and/or misuse
of public funds in almost all sectors, including the health sector."
Following Chapter 4 "Risk analysis and alternative strategy: Risks
related to good governance and corruption". Corruption is assessed
both from a technical and a political perspective. The overall view is
that sector support increases the possibility to address corruption
risks properly:
"Working with the framework of a SWAp, means that Sweden and other
collaborating partners (PC) have an overview of all resources including
GRZ, to the health sector. This implies that Sweden may be more aware
of mismanagement of funds and corruption than would otherwise be the
case. Within a SWAp environment corruption can be better dealt with
than in a traditional project environment and it is getting increasingly
difficult for politicians and public servants to misuse funds, regardless
of whether it is GRZ funds or CP funds".
The political perspective, by which is meant the willingness from the
political elite to seriously deal with corruption is "much more complicated".
"This perspective is closely interlinked with democracy, human rights
and good governance".
A Review of the National Health Strategic Plan was published in February
2004. The report indicates that the health sector has been in receipt
of rising budgets. It is however also noted that no exercise has been
undertaken to determine if trends of disbursements and expenditures have
been in the desired direction. The partners are therefore recommended
to attach high priority to tracking resource flows within the health
sector for the next period, and to design and implement a revised allocation
formula to individual districts to reflect relative mortality/morbidity
and poverty situation. There is no specific reference to corruption
risks.
Recommended reading
Zambia
National Health Accounts 2002: Main Findings, September 2004,
byFelix Phiri and Marie Tien, funded by USAID/REDSO, Sida and WHO.
This study also includes a study of the sources and uses of funding
for HIV/AIDS. The National Health Accounts methodology is a tool that
allows countries to track the flow of all health spending from financial
sources to end users. It includes estimates of household expenditures,
spending that governments have not historically considered when looking
at national health expenditures.
Other relevant anti-corruption projects in Zambia from
U4 database:
Review of corruption in the health sector:
theory, methods and interventions .pdf
(Taryn Vian)
This article presents a comprehensive framework and a set of methodologies for describing and measuring how opportunities, pressures and rationalizations influence corruption in the health sector. The article discusses implications for intervention, and presents examples of how theory has been applied in research and practice. Challenges of tailoring anti-corruption strategies to particular contexts, and future directions for research, are addressed.
Published in Health Policy and Planning (Volume 23, Number 2, March 2008). [The Open Access to this article is sponsored by U4]
A tale of two health systems. pdf (William D. Savedoff)
A closer look at two countries demonstrates how corruption manifests itself differently across health systems. Colombia and Venezuela are neighbouring Latin American countries with comparable incomes that share many similarities in history, culture and language. Until 1990, the two countries also had similarly fragmented health systems, comprised of a large social security institutions that served the formal sector; national or state-level governments that directly provided health care services to the rest of the population; and an active private sector that relied predominantly on direct payment for services by patients and their families.
In the early 1990s, Colombia engaged a series of dramatic health reforms that decentralised public services to the municipal level and, in parallel, created a mandatory universal insurance system with the participation of non-governmental insurers (for-profit and non-profit).
Detailed Implementation Review India Health Sector 2006-2007 Volume II .pdf
This Report summarizes the findings of a Detailed Implementation Review (DIR) of five
Bank-financed projects in India: the Food and Drugs Capacity Building Project, the Orissa
Health Systems Development Project, the Second National AIDS Control Project, the Malaria
Control Project, and the Tuberculosis Control Project.
This excellent working paper looks at factual
evidence to describe the main challenges facing health care delivery
in developing countries, including absenteeism, corruption, informal
payments, and mismanagement. The author concludes that good governance
is important in ensuring effective health care delivery, and that
returns to investments in health are low where governance issues
are not addressed. The paper provides policy options for promoting
better governance.