Corruption and Aid

No aid modality, agency or recipient is free from corruption risks. Find resources on the scope and nature of these risks and how they can be identified and addressed.

Concern about possible corruption in aid flows and projects has grown with increased pressure on donor aid budgets and greater attention to aid effectiveness. Not every donor, recipient or project will be equally exposed to corrupt practices; the context, modalities, choice of partners, and systems for detection all affect risk levels. Equally important is how aid providers respond and how they promote integrity from within.

 Among the resources in this U4 Theme Page you will:

 

everystockphoto 3044534 o

Contact

Nils Taxell

Senior Advisor

nils.taxell@cmi.no

+47 47938075

Interview with Steve Berkman, author of World Bank and the Gods of Lending,

  • video_thumb_7
 
pdf_thumb_2060
Author: Moon, S. and Williamson, T.
Release date: January 2010

Greater aid transparency: crucial for aid effectiveness

This paper explores the link between donor aid and recipient country budgets, and the role that greater transparency about aid can play in improving budget transparency, the quality of budgetary decisions, and accountability systems. The paper goes on to explore how current initiatives to improve aid transparency can best support better budgets and accountability in aid dependent countries.

pdf_thumb_2085
Author: Knack, S. and Eubank, N.
Release date: July 2009

Aid and Trust in Country Systems

It is generally understood that country systems are strengthened when donors trust recipients to manage aid funds, but undermined when donors manage aid through their own separate parallel systems. This paper provides an analytical framework for understanding donors’ decisions to trust in country systems or instead to micro-manage aid using their own systems and procedures. The authors show using fixed effects regression that a donor’s trust in recipient country systems is positively related to (1) trustworthiness or quality of those systems, (2) tolerance for risk on the part of the donor’s constituents, as measured by public support for providing aid, and (3) the donor’s ability to internalize more of the benefits of investing in country systems, as measured by the donor’s share of all aid provided to a recipient.

Top

On this page


Featured themes