Conventions overview
Organization of American States
Adopted: 29 March 1996 Signatories: 34 (as of 7 April 2006) Ratifications and Accessions: 33 (as of 7 April 2006). Only 1 signatory
(Barbados) has not ratified. Entry into force: 6 March 1997 Open to: Member states of the Organisation of American States
(34 states, excluding Cuba, which is an OAS member but has been excluded
from participation since 1962), and possibility of accession by any
other state. Official web page: Inter-American
Convention Against Corruption (OAS Convention), or click
here for an update at the Transparency International's web page (in
Spanish).
The Inter-American Convention Against Corruption (OAS
Convention) was the first international Anti-corruption Convention
when it was adopted in 1996 by the member states of the OAS. It represents
regional consensus about what states should do in the areas of prevention,
criminalisation, international cooperation and asset recovery.
General structure
28 articles
Arts I,II, IV, V, VI, XII, XVII Definitions, Purposes, Scope,
Jurisdiction, Acts of Corruption, Effect on State Property, Nature
of the Act Art III Preventive measures Art VII Domestic Law, to establish criminal offences Art VIII Transnational Bribery Art IX Illicit Enrichment Art X, XI Notification and Progressive Development Art XIII, XIV, XVIII, Art XX Extradition; Assistance and
Cooperation, Central Authorities, Other Agreements or Practices Art XV, XVI Measures Regarding Property, Bank Secrecy Art XIX, XXI, XXII - XXVIII Temporal Application, Signature,
Ratification, Accession, Reservations, Entry into Force, Denunciation,
Additional Protocols, Deposit of Original Instrument
Coverage:
Sectors covered: Public sector corruption, supply and demand sides
Corruption offences covered: Wide interpretation of corruption
offences, including bribery, domestic and foreign; illicit enrichment;
money laundering and concealment of property. Other offences to
be considered.
Measures: Preventive, criminalisation and regional assistance
cooperation measures, as well as provisions on recovery of assets
Level of obligation: Mixture of mandatory and discretionary provisions
Monitoring arrangements
A follow-up mechanism was adopted in June 2001. On this basis, a
Committee of Experts conducts technical analysis of implementation
by States Parties. Questionnaire circulated to States Parties and
civil society organizations and country reports made. The Committee
of Experts holds review meetings on implementation, which state representatives
and civil society are invited to attend. The final report published
on the OAS website.
Main benefits of the Convention
Regional agreement on importance of addressing corruption with
a comprehensive framework, setting common standards.
Regional cooperation framework providing improved for mutual law
enforcement assistance, notably in extradition and investigations.
(Arts. XIII, XIV, XVIII, Art XX)
List of preventive measures including: public sector standards
of conduct, and related training and enforcement mechanisms; declaration
of assets; standards for systems of hiring and procurement; government
revenue collection and control systems deterring corruption; denial
of tax deductibility of corruption-related expenditures; whistleblower
protection; oversight bodies; books and records requirements for
companies as well as internal accounting control requirements; mechanisms
to encourage participation of civil society. (Art. III)
States cannot invoke bank secrecy as a basis for refusal to provide
assistance sought by another state (Art. XVI)
Main weaknesses
Provisions on preventive measures drafted very broadly, allowing for
wide interpretation and discretionary practice
Requirement of sanctions against businesses limited to provision on
transnational bribery and no specific standards for sanctions
Lack of mandatory requirement of nationality jurisdiction
Explicit provision for reservations, though little used
Next steps
Adoption of new national legislation to meet Convention requirements;
depends on adequacy of existing legislation
A new TI publication which sets out how civil society
can develop an advocacy strategy which promotes the ratification, implementation
and inter-governmental follow-up and monitoring of conventions including
UNCAC.
The UN Convention against Corruption requires that States designate
a body or bodies to coordinate prevention and enforcement measures.
This study explores how such institutional arrangements might look,
and provides some lessons learned from existing models. A readable,
informative resource for practitioners.