Conventions overview
Council of Europe (Criminal convention)
Adopted: 4 November, 1998, by the Council of Ministers Opened for signature: Strasbourg, 27 January 1999 Signatories: 47 (as of 7 April 2006) Consisting of 44 member states
& 3 non-member states Ratifications and accessions: 33 (as of 7 April 2006) Entry into force: 1 July 2002 Open to: All member states of Council of Europe and 6 non-member
states (Belarus, Canada, Holy See, Japan, Mexico, USA). Also, EU and other
states can be invited to join. Official web page: Council
of Europe Criminal Law Convention on Corruption (CoE Criminal Convention)
The Council of Europe Criminal Law Convention on Corruption (CoE Criminal
Convention) was the third multinational anti-corruption convention to
be adopted and was negotiated by the member states of the Council of
Europe, along with the participation of a number of observers, including
Canada, Japan, Mexico and the United States. It represents a European
regional consensus on what states should in the areas of criminalisation
and international cooperation with respect to corruption.
General structure
Five chapters, 42 articles:
Chap. I Use of terms Art.1: Use of Terms
Chap. II Measures to be taken at National Level Arts. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6: Active bribery of domestic officials,
Passive bribery of domestic public officials, Bribery of members of
domestic public assemblies, Bribery of foreign public officials, Bribery
of members of foreign public assemblies Arts.7,8: Active bribery in the private sector, Passive bribery
in the private sector Arts. 9,10, 11: Bribery of officials of international organisations,
Bribery of members of international parliamentary assemblies, Bribery
of judges and officials of international courts Art.12: Trading in influence Art.13: Money laundering of proceeds from corruption offences Art.14: Account offences Arts.15,16,17: Participatory acts, Immunity and jurisdiction Art.18: Corporate liability Arts.19, 22, 23: Sanctions and measures, Protection of collaborators
of justice and witnesses, Measures to facilitate the gathering of
evidence and the confiscation of proceeds Arts. 20, 21: Specialised authorities, Co-operation with and
between national authorities
Chap. III Monitoring of Implementation Art. 24: Monitoring
Chap. IV International Co-operation Arts.25, 26, 27: General principles and measures for international
co-operation, Mutual assistance, Extradition Art 28, 29, 30, 31: Spontaneous information, Central authority,
Direct communication, Information
Chap.V (Final Provisions) Arts. 32, 33: Signature and entry into Force, Accession to
the Convention Art.34: Territorial application Art.35: Relationship to Other Conventions and Agreements Arts. 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42: Declarations, Reservations,
Validity and Review of Declarations and Reservations, Amendments,
Settlement of Disputes, Denunciation, Notification
Coverage
Sectors covered: Public sector and private sector (private-to-private)
corruption
Corruption offences covered: Broad range of offences including
bribery (domestic and foreign), trading in influence, money laundering
and accounting offences
Measures: Criminalisation and regional cooperation measures, as
well as provisions on recovery of assets
Level of obligation: Mandatory provisions but possibility of specified
reservations
Monitoring arrangements
A monitoring mechanism (GRECO) is provided for in Art 24.The GRECO
began functioning in May, 1999. It was established as a monitoring
mechanism pursuant to the Partial and Enlarged Agreement Establishing
the "Group of States Against Corruption-GRECO," adopted
by the Council of Europe's Committee of Ministers on 5 May, 1998.
Its aim is to monitor through a process of mutual evaluation and peer
pressure the compliance of States with their undertakings in the field
of corruption. Among these undertakings are the CoE Criminal and Civil
Law Conventions. As of 6 July, 2004, 38 states including the United
States had joined. Membership in the GRECO overlaps, but is not identical
to, membership in the CoE Criminal Law Convention. Although a State
Party automatically joins the GRECO when it ratifies the CoE Convention,
the reverse is not true; a State Party may choose to participate only
in the GRECO, but not accede to the CoE Convention.
Main benefits of the Convention
Regional agreement on importance of addressing corruption with
a joint framework, setting common standards for criminalisation.
Broad range of criminal offences, encompassing not only bribery
of domestic and foreign public officials, but also international
public officials and also covering bribery in the private sector
Regional cooperation framework providing improved for mutual law
enforcement assistance, including in extradition, investigations,
as well as confiscation and seizure of proceeds of corruption. Includes
restrictions on use of banking secrecy to block cooperation
Broad jurisdictional provisions (Art: 17)
Provision for corporate liability (Art. 18)
Requires effective, proportionate and dissuasive criminal penalties,
or, for legal persons, at least effective non-criminal sanctions
(Art. 19)
Requirement of creation of specialised anti-corruption authorities
(Art. 20)
Provisions on protection of whistleblowers and witnesses (Art.
22)
Functioning review process
Main weaknesses
Few preventive measures
No provision on statutes of limitation
Parties may make reservations to the Convention in relation to
some provisions
A new TI publication which sets out how civil society
can develop an advocacy strategy which promotes the ratification, implementation
and inter-governmental follow-up and monitoring of conventions including
UNCAC.
The UN Convention against Corruption requires that States designate
a body or bodies to coordinate prevention and enforcement measures.
This study explores how such institutional arrangements might look,
and provides some lessons learned from existing models. A readable,
informative resource for practitioners.