Interview with Dirk Thompson, June 2005How would you characterise the project in terms of progress (or lack
of so)? Did the project reach it's overall goal(s)? The project started slowly and had difficulties in the first month. Our
impression was, that the Prime Ministers Office, which was our partner
in the beginning, had other priorities in that period of time. For this
reason the GTZ team looked for an interested partner which it found in
the Parliament. The parliament offered an office for the project team
and established the contact to the Board for Finance which is responsible
for everything related to public finance. The project was beginning to show progress, when the Board for Finance
officially took over the responsibility for drafting a law on a Supreme
Audit Institution in Montenegro and commissioned the Inter-Institutional
Working group that had been established for this purpose. Today we can say, that the project progresses very well and that the
German side is very satisfied with the results already achieved. We are
very optimistic that the project will reach its overall goal until the
end of 2007. In your opinion, what made this project successful or less successful?
The success of the project is mainly due to the fact that on the Montenegrin
side we found motivated, qualified and ambitious partners. Namely the
Chairman of the Board for Finance and now the President of the SAI Montenegro
are to be mentioned. Are there any particular project highlights you would like to mention? It might be interesting to note, that the Law on SAI Montenegro was a
so-called parliamentary initiative, meaning that one Member of Parliament
submits the draft and initiates the legislative process. This showed how
much importance the Parliament accorded to this law and to the project. We were positively surprised when we were informed that the Senate of
the newly created SAI decided to realize the audit of the financial statement
of the Republic already in their first year of existence. Can you point to any lessons learned? One of the main lessons learned is that the Institution of the parliament is often neglected from the international community and that in some contexts it is worth cooperating with Parliament. As the overall goal of this project is to create a strong audit Institution that would be an information tool for the Parliament, it was only consequent to get the Parliament as the main partner. During the implementation of the project, a lot of contacts were established
and a lot of different issues concerning the development of the parliament
as a constitutional power have been discussed, which has contributed to
the awareness of MPs and the staff for the necessity to strengthen the
professionalism of the work of Parliament. For further information, please contact the Team leader in Podgorica: |
|
| |
|
| Home | Top | |
| U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre | http://www.u4.no |